|
|
|
|
That's the point. Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source, so an encyclopedia which is not much more reliable than Wikipedia is probably not a reliable source either. -- ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/NoticeboardReliable sources/Noticeboard. All articles must adhere to Wikipedia's neutrality policy, fairly representing all majority and significant-minority viewpoints that have been ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VerifiabilityMartin Hepp drew my attention on one of his upcoming publications; some related thoughts? The issues around URI-s come up regularly on the various SW related mailing list and ... http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/wikipedia-uri-s-as-reliable-identifiers-for-the-semantic-web/ ... In soviet russia, wikipedia unnecesarily edits YOU!!! ? ~ Russian reverser on wikipedia's ... skepticism, pseudoscience, hyperlinking, reverting articles, demanding reliable sources ... http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Wikipedia ... the "sum of all human knowledge" doesn't consider itself to be a reliable source. Wikipedia: ... good idea, site says", ZDNet Education, January 29 2007. "Halle Berry's New ... http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Is_Wikipedia_reliable%3F |
|
|